New study proposes ‘Goldilocks’ temperature zones as factories for generation of mineral deposits
Current understanding of the formation of porphyry deposits
Porphyry deposits are a major source of copper (Cu), gold
(Au), and molybdenum (Mo) (Fig. 1). These deposits contribute 75%, 50%, and 20% of
the Cu-, Mo-, Au produced in the world, respectively1.
Figure 1. Molybdenite (dark grey molybdenum-sulphide mineral) hosted in quartz (grey) veins in a porphyry deposit (Source2)
Typically, porphyry deposits form in magmatic arcs (oceanic
and continental) above subduction zones in a series of processes beginning with
(i) the expulsion of metal-enriched fluids from the subducting
slab into the mantle wedge resulting in partial melting of the mantle wedge,
followed by, (ii) the migration and stalling of such magmas in the magma
chambers in the mid to lower crust, and subsequently, (iii) the migration of metal-rich
fluids produced during the crystallisation of magmas in magma chambers into the
upper crust where they form pipe- and dyke-like porphyry deposits 3,4 (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Geological setting for the formation of
porphyry deposits (Source5)
Knowledge gaps and new contributions
The formation of porphyry deposits is fairly understood.
However, the mechanisms controlling the transfer of metals from the mantle/lower
crust to the upper crust in magmatic arcs where there are likely to form porphyry deposits remain elusive
6.
A new study
published in Nature Communications proposes a mechanism in an attempt to constrain
conditions conducive for such metal transfer events7. The study investigates
magmatic sulphides hosted in magmas located in the melting-assimilation-storage-homogenisation
(MASH) zones in the lower crust (Fig. 2). The samples used in the study were
collected from the Ivrea Zone, a rare geological archive host to lower crustal cumulate
rocks accumulated at the base of continental crust now rotated by almost 90o.
The study found that the process central to fluxing of metals (Cu
and Au in the case of porphyry systems) is the “Goldilocks” temperature window
(1090-1160 oC) in the lower crust
whereby the two metal-hosting sulphide phases exist in different physical forms,
a solid Ni-Fe-rich monosulphide solution (mss) and Cu-Au-rich sulphide melt. Such
a temperature window allows the fractionation and mobilisation of the Cu-Au-rich
sulphide melts which ascend into the upper crust and possibly form economic deposits (e.g., porphyry deposits),
and the trapping of Ni-Fe-rich material in the cumulate residue.
References and further reading
1. Sillitoe, R. H. Porphyry Copper
Systems. Econ. Geol. 105, 3–41 (2010).
2. Rüegg, P. How ore deposits are
formed. ETH Life
ethlife.ethz.ch/archive_articles/121120_erzlagerstaetten_per/index_EN.html
(2012).
3. Hedenquist, J. W. Lowenstern, J. B.
The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. Nature
370, 519–527 (1994).
4. Richards, J. P. Magmatic to
hydrothermal metal fluxes in convergent and collided margins. Ore Geol. Rev.
40, 1–26 (2011).
5. Wilkinson, J. J. Triggers for the
formation of porphyry ore deposits in magmatic arcs. Nat. Geosci. 6,
917–925 (2013).
6. Sillitoe, R. H. Porphyry and
Hydrothermal Copper and Gold Deposits: A Global Perspective. in (ed. Porter, T.
M.) 21–34 (PCG Publishing, 1998).
7. Holwell, D. A. et al.
Mobilisation of deep crustal sulfide melts as a first order control on upper
lithospheric metallogeny. Nat. Commun. 573, 1–12 (2022).
Comments
Post a Comment